Comparison of the personality profiles of married couples-ii: Using hexaco personality model Evli çiftlerin kişilik profillerinin karşılaştırılması-ii: Hexaco kişilik modeli


Creative Commons License

TATAR A., Saltukoğlu G., Özdemir H.

Cyprus Turkish Journal of Psychiatry and Psychology, cilt.2, sa.1, ss.5-13, 2020 (Scopus) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 2 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2020
  • Doi Numarası: 10.35365/ctjpp.20.2.1
  • Dergi Adı: Cyprus Turkish Journal of Psychiatry and Psychology
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.5-13
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Dyadic Consensus, HEXACO Personality Model, Marital Adjustment, Personality
  • Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

This study aimed to examine the relationship between personality traits and marital adjustment in the framework of dyadic consensus. In this direction, the aim of the study was, a) to use and to test the observer form of the HEXACO Personality Inventory, b) to examine the HEXACO personality model in terms of marital adjustment, c) to examine the role of dyadic consensus of couples in marital adjustment. The participants of the study were 296 women and 253 men, a total of 549 people with their spouses a total of 1098 people who were married for a year and more. One of the spouse assessed oneself with the Dyadic Consensus subscale of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale and the HEXACO Personality Inventory self report form, the other spouse assessed his/her couple with the HEXACO Personality Inventory observer report form. The results showed that the internal consistence reliability coefficient of the HEXACO Personality Inventory observer report form was between 0.74 and 0.81 and its correlation coefficient with the self-report form was between 0.56 and 0.71. According to HEXACO personality model, the difference between individuals’ assessments of themselves and their spouses was only in the Openness to Experiences factor, no differences were detected in the other factors. Though, there were differences between low and high dyadic consensus groups in the factors of Conscientiousness and Openness to Experience factors. The results were discussed in terms of observed and self-report form differences, personality traits, couple adjustment and dyadic consensus.