Comparison of Four Different DNA Isolation Methods from MGIT Culture for Long-Read Whole Genome Sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis


ARSLAN N., DEMİRAY GÜRBÜZ E., ÖZKÜTÜK N., ESEN N., ÖZKÜTÜK A. A.

Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology, cilt.17, sa.9, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 17 Sayı: 9
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.5812/jjm-148070
  • Dergi Adı: Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Veterinary Science Database
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Whole Genome Sequencing, Next Generation Sequencing, Nanopore Sequencing, DNA, Isolation and Purification
  • Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global health challenge, particularly due to drug resistance and limitations in rapid diagnosis. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), especially long-read whole genome sequencing (WGS), shows promise for rapidly detecting TB and drug resistance, but it requires high-quality DNA, which is difficult to extract from Mycobacterium tuberculosis due to its complex cell wall. Objectives: This study evaluated four DNA isolation methods for extracting pure DNA from M. tuberculosis, aiming to standardize protocols for long-read WGS. Methods:Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37RV colonies were grown in BACTEC MGIT liquid medium. Two pellets were prepared as the initial material for the DNA extraction protocol: Pellets from 1 mL McFarland 2 suspensions and all growing colonies from two MGIT liquid cultures. Four DNA extraction methods were used: The cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method, GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification Kit, Quick-DNA Fecal/Soil Microbe Kit, and Genematrix Tissue/Bacterial DNA Purification Kit, with some modifications. DNA quality was assessed based on concentration, purity, and integrity. Results: Among the tested methods, the Quick-DNA Fecal/Soil Kit yielded approximately 85 ng/mL of DNA and a purity of 1.9 at 260/280 nm from the colonial pellet of two MGIT tubes. However, lower intact DNA [DNA integrity number (DIN) ~ 6.8] was obtained with this kit. The CTAB method provided the highest intact DNA (DIN ~ 9.5), although the purity of the DNA was not sufficient. Conclusions: Based on three repetitions of McF-2 and colonial pellet extractions, the Quick-DNA Fecal/Soil Kit yielded the highest DNA quantity and purity but showed lower integrity compared to other methods, indicating the need for adjustments. A pellet from two MGIT cultures (~ 100 µL) is suitable for long-read WGS with this kit. However, a larger sample size is required to generalize these findings. For effective long-read sequencing of M. tuberculosis, DNA extraction protocols must be optimized to balance yield, fragment size, and purity for accurate sequencing and drug resistance analysis.