Evaluation of the Meet-URO Score in a Real-World Cohort of mRCC Patients Treated with First-Line TKIs


Özalp F. R., Şahin Hafızoğlu E., Arslan A. M., Çakmak M., Biter S., İZGÖR R. B., ...Daha Fazla

Journal of Clinical Medicine, cilt.14, sa.18, 2025 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 14 Sayı: 18
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3390/jcm14186385
  • Dergi Adı: Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: IMDC, Meet-URO score, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, prognostic model, tyrosine kinase inhibitor
  • Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background: The Meet-URO score combines the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and bone metastasis status. Although developed in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) cohorts, its performance among patients receiving first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy is uncertain. Methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 301 adults with histologically confirmed metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with first-line TKI monotherapy (sunitinib, pazopanib, or cabozantinib) between 2008 and 2025 across five tertiary centers in Turkey. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Meet-URO was calculated at treatment start and analyzed as prespecified risk strata (0–4, 5–8, 9). Kaplan–Meier estimates, Cox models, and Harrell’s C-index assessed discrimination, with bootstrapped 95% CIs. Results: Median follow-up was 40 months; median OS (mOS) was 25 months (95% CI, 21–29) and median progression-free survival was 10 months (95% CI, 8–12). Meet-URO stratified OS: 41 months for scores 0–4, 21 months for 5–8, and 7 months for 9 (log-rank p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, Meet-URO remained independently prognostic (HR 1.73 for 5–8 vs. 0–4; HR 3.57 for 9 vs. 0–4; both p < 0.001). Discrimination was modest (C-index 0.722) and slightly lower than IMDC (C-index 0.745). NLR ≥ 3.2 was associated with inferior OS (19 vs. 37 months; p < 0.001). Bone metastasis was not significantly associated with OS (p = 0.27). Conclusions: Meet-URO is a valid prognostic tool for mRCC patients treated with first-line TKIs and identifies an ultra-high-risk subgroup (score = 9) with poor survival. While not superior to IMDC, Meet-URO may offer complementary risk information to support clinical monitoring and trial referral, particularly in settings where ICI combinations are restricted.