Acute sprint performance responses to velocity-based versus traditional post activation performance enhancement interventions

Creative Commons License

Tutar M., Genç S., Çağlayan A., GÜNAY E.

PLOS ONE, cilt.20, sa.9 September, 2025 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 20 Sayı: 9 September
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332479
  • Dergi Adı: PLOS ONE
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, Animal Behavior Abstracts, Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA), BIOSIS, Biotechnology Research Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts Core, Food Science & Technology Abstracts, Index Islamicus, Linguistic Bibliography, MEDLINE, Pollution Abstracts, Psycinfo, zbMATH, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The aim of this study was to compare the acute effects of velocity-based training (VBT), traditional strength training (TSG) and a non- strength control condition (CG) on sprint performance in trained individuals. In Session 1, anthropometric measurements of the participants were taken, and then 1 repetition maximum (1RM) squat values were determined after explanation, visual demonstration and familiarization of the sprint test and VBT method. In the second session, all participants performed a sprint test for the control condition. In the third session, participants completed the post activation performance enhancement (PAPE) protocol specific to their group after a standard warm-up and then performed sprint tests. In the 0–10 m distance, only the group×time interaction was significant (p=.014); a performance decrease (p=.016) was observed in the TSG group. In the 0–20 m sprint, time (p<.001), group (p=.043), and interaction (p=.003) effects were significant, and a significant performance increase was found in the VBT and TSG groups (p<.001). In the 0–30 m sprint, group (p=.015) and interaction (p<.001) effects were significant; an improvement was observed in the VBT group (p<.001) and a decrease in the TSG group (p=.039). In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the VBT protocol produced a more noticeable acute improvement in sprint performance compared to TSG, even when applied with the same load absolute.