Atıf Formatları
Which implant is better for treating reverse obliquity fractures of the proximal femur: A standard or long nail?
  • IEEE
  • ACM
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • MLA
  • Harvard
  • BibTeX

G. OKCU Et Al. , "Which implant is better for treating reverse obliquity fractures of the proximal femur: A standard or long nail?," Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research , vol.471, no.9, pp.2768-2775, 2013

OKCU, G. Et Al. 2013. Which implant is better for treating reverse obliquity fractures of the proximal femur: A standard or long nail?. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research , vol.471, no.9 , 2768-2775.

OKCU, G., Ozkayin, N., Okta, C., TOPÇU, İ., & Aktuglu, K., (2013). Which implant is better for treating reverse obliquity fractures of the proximal femur: A standard or long nail?. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research , vol.471, no.9, 2768-2775.

OKCU, GÜVENİR Et Al. "Which implant is better for treating reverse obliquity fractures of the proximal femur: A standard or long nail?," Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research , vol.471, no.9, 2768-2775, 2013

OKCU, GÜVENİR Et Al. "Which implant is better for treating reverse obliquity fractures of the proximal femur: A standard or long nail?." Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research , vol.471, no.9, pp.2768-2775, 2013

OKCU, G. Et Al. (2013) . "Which implant is better for treating reverse obliquity fractures of the proximal femur: A standard or long nail?." Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research , vol.471, no.9, pp.2768-2775.

@article{article, author={GÜVENİR OKCU Et Al. }, title={Which implant is better for treating reverse obliquity fractures of the proximal femur: A standard or long nail?}, journal={Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research}, year=2013, pages={2768-2775} }